I believe the short timeline for approval of this legislation has prevented residents and communities from engaging with the city and addressing and resolving their concerns about the ordinance.
Click headline to read more.
Opinion
Connected Communities response: Paul Harten, Lenox Avenue
Rather than rezoning for higher housing densities, the Cincinnati Metro transit system can be improved everywhere to promote services …
Click headline to read more.
Connected Communities response: Marcia and Dirk Pastoor, Clinton Springs Avenue
Aside from disruption to us the taxpayers, are the financial costs incurred by the city itself. Look up what we’re spending on Police/Fire/EMT calls alone on properties such as 882 Clinton Springs, 730 E. Mitchell, and Rion Lane complex. Currently the city is totally unable to properly manage these blighted properties.
Connected Communities response: Joan Wyler, Rose Hill Avenue
The purpose of zoning has always been protection for the homeowner. The proposed amendments do the opposite.
Click headline to read more.
Connected Communities response: Ron Bunt, Avon Fields Lane
First and foremost, the proposed development is simply too large for our area. This project is simply not the right fit for our community.
Click headline to read more.
[2nd] Connected Communities response: Margaret Keim, resident of North Avondale
Following California’s passage of SB-9, a similar legislation to eliminate single family zoning, many municipalities are now scrambling to put measures in place to blunt the ill-effects they are now experiencing.
Connected Communities response: Sarah Rich (Rose Hill Avenue)
If you have an extreme housing shortage in the ENTIRE City, then change zoning in ALL of the City. How you can selectively destroy certain neighborhoods, diminish property values and concentrate poverty all based on bus routes?
Click headline to read more.
Connected Communities response: Francine Buescher (Avon Fields Place)
The plan does not consider community-driven development for North Avondale’s historic, architectural and cultural preservation.
Click headline to read more.
Connected Communities response: David S. Arends, AIA OAA (Beechwood Avenue)
Eight opposition points from an architect and North Avondale resident’s perspective including housing unit density, offstreet parking, zoning code restrictions and quality, building setbacks, property values, and economic growth of our city.
Click headline for more.
Connected Communities response: Meg Keim (Beechwood Avenue)
In its current form…..the city would be ignoring federal HUD policies which limit the density of neighborhoods that already have high concentrations of publicly funded income restricted housing.
Click headline for more.